Much has been written, in Nature Portfolio journals and elsewhere, on the peer-review system as a whole. Alternative systems have been proposed in outline: for example, signed peer-review ...
Peer review is a central feature of academic work. It's the process through which research ends up published in an academic ...
Knowing how to distinguish between what is required by standards and what is opinion is crucial for auditors to confidently navigate these reviews and inspections.
Learn about the concerns and experiences of physicians with peer reviews, as revealed in a Medscape report. Find out what motivates peer reviews ...
Of the 78 top journals that provide this guidance, 59% prohibit its use in peer review, while the rest allow its use if ...
Also, an internal controls expert joined for a discussion on COSO and its relationship to SAS 145, and a current Auditing Standards Board member addressed questions the AICPA has been receiving on the ...
There are plenty of reasons why instructors encourage peer review, but here are a few that are relevant to you as a writer. It gives you an authentic response from a reader—without judgment. It allows ...
Study examines AI's role in peer review among top 100 medical journals, revealing that while most journals provide AI ...
A new study revealed divergent policies on artificial intelligence (AI) use in peer review among leading medical journals, ...
1. Physicians are the most common initiators of peer reviews against other physicians, doing so in 31% of cases. 2. Sixty percent of physicians said that the overall impact of a peer review was ...
For example, our report, ‘Is publishing in the chemical sciences ... In doing so, we hope to broaden our collective knowledge and offer researchers an improved peer review experience. We encourage ...