In the latest lawsuit, Apple was awarded $250 in damages – the statutory minimum, which was what the company sought in its complaint. Lawyers for the company said the main intention was not to win damages, but to prevent the sale of Masimo's smartwatches, so it was a failure on that score.

Apple has sought an injunction against health tech maker Masimo’s own smart watches, but it also netted the bare minimum for patent infringement.

Apple convinced a federal jury on Friday that early versions of health monitoring tech company Masimo's smartwatches infringe two of its design patents as part of a broader intellectual property dispute between the companies.

Apple convinced a federal jury on Friday that health monitoring tech company Masimo’s smartwatches infringe two of its design patents.

A federal jury ruled Friday that Masimo smartwatches infringed Apple patents, but Apple isn’t getting a big payday. Bloomberg Law reports that the company

A federal jury Friday ruled that Masimo's smartwatches infringed on Apple Watch patents, but awarded Apple just $250 in damages, which is

The legal battle between Apple and medical technology company Masimo rages on, with the bigger company — sorta, kinda — winning their latest face off. A federal jury has agreed with Apple that previous versions of Masimo's W1 and Freedom (pictured above) watches infringed on its design patents,

But what was even more amusing is than neither Apple not Masimo could admit what the case was really about for the respective parties … Apple argued that health tech company Masimo had infringed on its design patents by copying the look of the Apple Watch and charger.

A federal jury awarded Apple a nominal $250 in damages in its ongoing legal battle with Masimo, the medical technology company. Apple’s lawsuit centered on claims that Masimo’s earlier smartwatch models,